Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/10/2022 8:32:53 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Yep, Stephen Breyer’s brother, also nominated by Clinton.


2 posted on 08/10/2022 8:37:20 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Why Walgreen’s still has any operating stores in the city of San Francisco is beyond me. They should have closed all of them once city hall declared open theft regulations.


3 posted on 08/10/2022 8:38:48 PM PDT by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

OK - if the prosecution/plaintiff could prove that Walgreens (I assume this is not just against a single location, but the corporation) willfully and knowingly dispensed these drugs to obvious fake prescriptions... I might see a case.

But where is that proof in this? In fact - I might even question if a pharmacy even has the authority to just choose to ignore what appears to a reasonable eye to be a real prescription from a real doctor. Other than watching for known drug interaction/contradictions or giving patients instructions on the taking of medications that are new to them... I really don’t see it being Walgreens (or any other pharmacy’s) business.

There are TWO entities that ought to be in the crosshairs of these cases:

1 - Doctors who continued to prescribe (and over-prescribe) these opioid pain medications, particularly after it became glaringly obvious that they actually are extremely addictive and damaging in many ways to a patient’s health...

2- The pharmaceutical companies themselves (who seem to often get a free pass in this) - who submitted that these drugs were incapable of causing dependency (despite the family of chemicals they are synthetic analogs of are some of the most addictive substances on earth - opiates). Drug makers who swore under oath. Who submitted false study data, who paid huge amounts of money and went to amazing lengths to conceal the truth about them from both the public and the FDA (which itself was negligent in its approval of the drugs).


6 posted on 08/10/2022 9:30:53 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Sounds like an absurd ruling. A pharmacist is presented with a valid prescription from a licensed, practicing physician - what is the pharmacist supposed to do, overrule the physician and refuse to dispense the medication because the order is “suspicious”, whatever that means?


7 posted on 08/10/2022 9:33:39 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Stupid judge


10 posted on 08/10/2022 10:39:19 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The opioid crisis is being fueled entirely by the justice department.. There are those who are getting filthy rich defending, holding, housing, feeding and caring for the victims of this, so called, epidemic..

The democrats are making money hand over fist selling the fentanyl, crack, meth and who knows what. But the real money is made on the "law and order" side of the deal. So, the problem ain't going to go away anytime soon..

Well, that's my opinion...

31 posted on 08/11/2022 6:03:15 PM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson