I read the article about the New York fraud and it’s more sophisticated than many of the frauds perpetrated before. If I understood the story correctly, a person can ask for the voter rolls in data format, but any attempt to manipulate the data, such as sorting the list by any field, changes the data and information that was in the previous version is lost completely. I assume a backup of the rolls is possible so an examiner always has the original data without asking for it again.
It sounds like the computer coding used to create and store the voter rolls includes built-in self destruction commands in the event that anyone tries to sort the data into something more easily interpreted. That could have been an overseas project and would qualify as an act of treason by the American who contracted out the job. The programmer and the company he works for in the foreign country (China?) would be guilty of espionage, and if his government sanctioned or knew about the act, the country could be seen as committing an act of war under PDJT’s executive order covering critical infrastructure.
We may never know if this is the kind of information that Dong Jingwei passed along to President Trump. We’re at the 11th hour in both identifying all manner of frauds used in 2020 and in preventing them from being used again in the 2022 election. Maybe the goal is to let the fraudsters know that others know what was done in the past and to prevent them from trying it again since a challenge of the results would be more immediate and more specific.
When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.
Thom Jefferson quoting Baron de Montesquieu