They assign various infrared wavelengths to colors on the visible spectrum, the familiar reds, blues, yellows, etc.
—
The usual hyperbolic “news” article. The telescope gathers light in frequencies humans cannot see, so obviously the “images”, and even that’s an antiquated term as everything is gathered digitally, are manipulated to render a visible color value.
I don’t mind enhancements to stuff we can’t see with the eye. The telescopes have given us insight into some pretty cool stuff, enhanced or not.
As much as it cost, TPTB have to keep the public’s interest up.
Well, it’s what you have to do to see the invisible.
Think of it as “down converting”.
The Carina Nebula, an enormous cloud of dust and gas 7,600 light years away, as well as the Southern Ring Nebula, which surrounds a dying star 2,000 light years away.
Carina Nebula is famous for its towering pillars that include “Mystic Mountain,” a three-light-year-tall cosmic pinnacle captured in an iconic image by Hubble.
https://phys.org/news/2022-07-nasa-reveals-webb-telescope-cosmic.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carina_Nebula
This freeper has been saying this for years now. 95% artist enhancement, 5% true data.
The whole point of any telescope is to see beyond.
Some folks are just never satisfied. No vision!
“James” = Ya’akov. It’s a ginormous weBB of intel.
2B or not 2B, that is the question.
+
2B
PLUS SIGN
Assignment of various infrared wavelengths to colors on the visible spectrum allows humans to "see" what the optical senors detect and can analyze for a better understanding of the cosmos and cosmic events.
While computers and sensors use that data to test the Theories that Scientists and Researchers develop, everyone can "see" the data that is invisible.
Are the Colors in Webb Telescope Images ‘Fake’?
“Fake” is such an ugly word. Can’t we just call it “enhanced”? /s
Think about how here on Earth, even with modern digital cameras (which also do image correction, just on the fly so you don't realize it) but even with that, it's sometimes difficult to take a good picture without it being washed out from too much light, or too dim, or have too much contrast. Now imagine trying to take the same picture in space or on another planet where amounts of light totally different from Earth.
Isaac Schultz is obviously a liberal arts major.
I refuse to look at anything but the original infrared.