[Steve_Seattle]

Carbon dioxide (CO2) comprises about .04% (four one hundredths of one percent) of the atmosphere, and 95% of CO2 is generated naturally by the oceans, plant and animal respiration, decaying organic matter, and volcanoes. It's hard to see how that tiny amount of CO2 is what's driving "climate change."

Moreover, "climate change" is used to explain completely opposite developments: drought and flooding, extreme cold and extreme heat, more hurricanes and fewer hurricanes. Thus, as an explanatory principle, it is worthless.

[Leaning Right]

You make an excellent argument. And if this were just a routine scientific topic, papers would be written defending your views. And debates would be held in lecture halls.

But this is of course “settled science” (never mind that science is never settled). So any scientist who defended your viewpoint would be heckled, booed, and cancelled. This is fascist behavior.

The greenies either can’t see that, or they just don’t care. It’s scary either way.

[Tucker39]

That’s because the notion that any activity that the entire human race might engage in could affect our climate in any way, shape or manner is a lying scam. We can no more affect it than a fart in a hurricane. The climate does vary, incessantly, but human activity has nothing to do with it.