Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: joshua c
and the long-term effects of the vaccine are?

That has been the number one argument I have had since these vaccines started to roll out - we do not know the long-term effects yet. I refused to be vaccinated. We cannot yet time travel into the future to judge long term effects. All we can do is "predict"; analogous to the weatherman doing the short-term predictions, and Farmer's Almanac doing long-term predictions.

Unfortunately, if everyone thinks like I do and refuses to get vaccinated due to the long-term effects of virus or vaccine being unknown, this stalemate leads to we'll never know which ended up being worse: long term-effects from either Covid-19 or any of the vaccines created - until it's too late.

Another possible stalemate scenario is that the next time a similar "worldwide health hazard" occurs, do we flip a coin IN CHOOSING whether or not to get vaccinated?

Damn if you do, damn if you don't.

103 posted on 08/02/2022 8:29:45 PM PDT by Deaf and Discerning (Sounds like a Twight Zone episode...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Deaf and Discerning
We cannot yet time travel into the future to judge long term effects.

Well, maybe if you had got the vaxx you could time travel:

Sounds cool! Now I wish I had got it.

166 posted on 08/03/2022 2:04:06 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Deaf and Discerning; joshua c; Texas Fossil; Jane Long
the next time a similar "worldwide health hazard" occurs, do we flip a coin IN CHOOSING whether or not to get vaccinated?

Damn if you do, damn if you don't.

The darker the purple, the more shots you got. The grey is unvaxxxxxxxxed.

It's pretty clear from that figure that in British Columbia that more vaxxxxed were dying, the more the more vaxxxxed, the more dead.

SUBSTACK POST BC authorities stopping posting this format as it does NOT show what they want to show

========================================

Looking somewhere else:

It's pretty clear from this info from England, the more clot shots, the more likely you are in the dead category.

===================================================

If the vaxxxxxxines are so bad, MORE people would be dying after the vaxxxxxxines were given.

Group Death Benefits taken from Lincoln National’s annual statements for the three years:

2019: $500,888,808

2020: $547,940,260

2021: $1,445,350,949

It's very clear that more people are dying as the 5th largest life insurance company is paying out almost THREE times more $$$ in death benefits as before the scamdemic.

CONCLUSION:

You are definitely more damned if you took the jabs. The more jabs you took, the more likely you are to die. ACTION NOW? STOP GETTING JABBED.

LINK QUESTION: Why is anyone NOT taking preventative meds but if you are too lazy, why not treat C-19 with HIGHLY EFECTIVE drugs?

These two doctors have treated more than 10,000 C-19 patients, four hospitalized, ZERO fatalities. They wrote a book, testified to the US Senate on early treatments being extremely effective. And they say the obvious, the vaxxxxxines are extremely dangerous and are NOT needed as safe drug treatments are very effective.

190 posted on 08/03/2022 8:44:38 PM PDT by politicianslie (Those who got vaxxed need to update their wills. You are a guinea pig in a dangerous drug trial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson