Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

No, that’s a study - past tense.

The FReeper made the following claim:

“A majority of pregnant women who take the clot shots lose their babies”

That claim was made present tense. Where are the stats right now to back up that claim present tense?


13 posted on 08/01/2022 12:39:10 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

Well, you know that doctors are punished for saying that the clot shot causes clots or any other medical harm, so it’s going to be hard to come by those numbers.

Say, why doesn’t your conscience bother you when you try to protect toxic vaccines by pointing out ‘past tense’ versus ‘present tense’ as if that matters? The data from the trial is ‘better’ in that it was controlled so whining that ‘that was yesterday’ is just a malevolent psyop. I mean, I couldn’t face myself in a mirror running the kind of pointless interference you have done (past tense) and are doing (present tense), even if babies weren’t involved.


15 posted on 08/01/2022 12:44:46 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Why would you give the clot shot to pregnant women, claiming it was safe and effective, given Pfizer’s own data???

You’re missing the forest for the trees.


109 posted on 08/02/2022 2:14:43 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson