Don’t forget that lawyers write the legislation, pass the legislation, and judge actions arising out of the legislation. Thus, it really is just a fluid game of who has the best argument or can bring an action before a friendly lawyer-judge, and the law is beside the point, not the point. I have no doubt some lawyer will argue that a jury, and not a prosecutor or judge, should be the one to decide if this meets self-defense standards or is a reckless endangerment, bla bla bla.
All the more reason not to shoot if you’re not in immediate danger, and to have shooter’s/CCW insurance.
In Texas, you have the right to kill a thief attempting to steal your property. At least one older case enabled this when a defendant shot and killed a thief from an apartment window, the thief trying to steal his property (e.g., car, contents, etc.). In view of such a law, the maimed or fatality due to collateral damage might also be viewed lightly.