Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yep, it's true! They're coming for your guns.
American Thinker ^ | 27 Jul, 2022 | D. Parker

Posted on 07/27/2022 5:13:43 AM PDT by MtnClimber

Democrat Rep. David N "Spare Me The B------- about Constitutional Rights" Cicilline and others have said the quiet part out loud: they want to ban almost all semi-automatic weapons in common use.

If you wondered why the nation's socialist news cabal American Pravda suddenly decided to drop the terms "assault weapon" and "assault rifle" from their propaganda lexicon, your answer was soon forthcoming in their triumphant announcement of their next onslaught against your sensible civil rights: "Democrats push for 1st semi-automatic gun ban in 20 years."

In a tyrannical two-for-one special, not only have the enemies of liberty of the fascist far left admitted that the whole point of this was to ban weapons in common use, but they're also tacitly defying the United States Supreme Court ruling District of Columbia v. Heller.

This video from pro-freedom patriot Colion Noir gives a good rundown on the facts in this case.

Most damning is this exchange between Dan Bishop (R) and chairman of the Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler (D) in a congressional committee meeting during the markup of the bill on July 20, 2022:

Bishop: Is there anyone on the other side that would dispute that this bill would ban weapons that are in common use in the United States today?

Nadler: Yeah, that's the point of the bill.

Bishop: To clarify, Mr. Chairman, you're saying it is the point of the bill to ban weapons that are in common use in the United States today?

Nadler: Yes, the problem is they are in common use.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; communism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: MtnClimber

Come and take them, congressman.


21 posted on 07/27/2022 6:08:12 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I think it’s effectively theatre too. They have to do something for those bloomberg bucks and like you said it’s an issue they can throw to their low info soccer mom contingent.

FReegards


22 posted on 07/27/2022 6:16:22 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bert

Smash the pelvic girdle. It’s instantly debilitating and is a bigger target.


23 posted on 07/27/2022 6:27:35 AM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

“Democrat Rep. David N “Spare Me The B-——— about Constitutional Rights”

That statement alone should be cause for immediate removal from office.


24 posted on 07/27/2022 6:33:08 AM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Boating accidents, or a shooting civil war? The latter is far more appropriate.


25 posted on 07/27/2022 6:35:18 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Well they can come and take mine, bullet anyway:-)


26 posted on 07/27/2022 6:40:53 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicoDon

None of us here vote for the rat party. The question is how do we influence others not to?


27 posted on 07/27/2022 6:44:09 AM PDT by 38special (I should've said something earlier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
This won't even fly with Democrat voters. They had a much better chance of banning guns 30 years ago than they do now

NOw, even Democrats think they need guns, to protect themselves from violent white supremicists.

28 posted on 07/27/2022 6:44:10 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (“There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach,” said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bshaw

Agreed


29 posted on 07/27/2022 6:55:37 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to says it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

We’ve known a ban was the plan back in 1962.

Starting in 1962 with the demand of Dems Thomas J. Dodd and Emanuel Celler...
1962 We ONLY want to register handguns. Rifles will not be affected!
1964, We ONLY want to register ALL firearms, not ban them.
1968 We ONLY want to register all guns, and ban the import of foreign Saturday Night Specials, and 5-shot bolt action army surplus rifles! (they got the ban).
1970, We ONLY want to ban small American handguns. Rifles will not be affected!
1976 We ONLY want to ban ALL handguns! Rifles will not be affected!
1981, Actress Lee Grant on Good Morning America screams and pokes holes in the air with her finger...”THE NRA IS A RIFLE ORGANIZATION! THEY SHOULD GIVE UP THEIR HANDGUNS AND THEY CAN KEEP THEIR RIFLES!”
1984, They came for the rifles.
Gun owners know they are always up against a stacked deck.


30 posted on 07/27/2022 7:01:37 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (“Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms.” – Aristotl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 38special

You really think there are no Independents here?


31 posted on 07/27/2022 7:05:56 AM PDT by NicoDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
My faith in the SCOTUS is not as strong as yours. The deliberate illegal alien invasion across the Mexican border will eventually lead to naturalization and new DemonRat voters who will heartily approve expanding the court to 12-15 seats. And then the 2A will be toast.

This Congress will attempt to pass another 1994 AWB but make it permanent. I don't trust the 10 RINO Senators who helped pass last month's gun control bill. Still, the bill may not pass.

Failing an AWB bill (either by Congressional vote or SCOTUS overrule), look for Biden to direct the BATFE to copycat POTUS #41 GHWB in 1989 and issue a directive to ban manufacture & sale of semi-auto rifles based upon the GCA of 1968's definition of firearms that do not meet "sporting purposes". That action by GHWB (banned importation of assault weapons) is what led to the Congress passing the 1994 AWB.

The other long-range strategy the DemonRat Deep State is pursuing is the illegal development of a national firearm registry by the ATF. We know ATF has been digitizing Form 4473s for roughly 25 years ostensibly for their criminal gun trace program. If it is turned into a searchable gun registry that provides them the means to identify who has what. Of course it is likely that a majority of these firearms have already been legally transferred to another owner without a paper trace.

The nightmare of a national firearm registry could be justified by the DemonRats as consistent with the 2A's "well regulated militia". That would mean the Congress passing a bill to command all citizens to register their unregistered firearms. We know the majority of semi-auto rifle owners in NY and CT ignored their state bills to register these firearms after the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting. So how do you identify who legally owns unregistered firearms? The information technology tools exist if the Deep State has the will.

32 posted on 07/27/2022 7:10:07 AM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

What good will it do if we can’t practice? If a neighbor sees it and rats us out?


33 posted on 07/27/2022 7:13:24 AM PDT by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MacNaughton

Your cynicism is well warranted. Or political and justice system has been severely compromised. I honestly don’t think anything but a complete and total flush with a rebuild having many checks and balances to prevent this from happening again can fix this.

That won’t happen if the squishy GOPe RINO circle jerk is in charge of the GOP. We need a clean republican leadership that will not be part of the Uniparty. That’s what got us into this mess to begin with. The dems were able to compromise enough republicans to go along with their agenda or they were planted there as RINO’s long ago or even recently.

Outside money appears to be a huge driving factor of this corruption. If that can be prevented we have a chance of saving this republic. Outside money meaning out of state or even out of country (foreign influence). ie Soros, Davos Group, WEF group, Blackrock, etc. etc.


34 posted on 07/27/2022 7:37:03 AM PDT by Boomer ( George Orwell: “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

400 Cops——verses
One Motivated Citizen.
.
Do the Math !


35 posted on 07/27/2022 8:06:43 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (We Are JONAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Bishop: To clarify, Mr. Chairman, you're saying it is the point of the bill to ban weapons that are in common use in the United States today? Nadler: Yes, the problem is they are in common use.

Sad to see Nads losing his seat.

36 posted on 07/27/2022 8:08:22 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

Kudos to the INDIANA mall
‘Good Samaritan!’


37 posted on 07/27/2022 8:14:40 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (We Are JONAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

We are on the same page.


38 posted on 07/27/2022 8:22:09 AM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: D Rider
400 cops waiting for instructions will not follow illegal orders when given? No, that is exactly what they will do. They will come after you for your guns, they will violate your constitutional rights. All of your rights.

Including your right to live.

The police are not your friends. They are the enforcement arm of the police state.

39 posted on 07/27/2022 11:51:12 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Unprintable.


40 posted on 07/27/2022 4:23:22 PM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson