... I mean, this is the ultimate important question for physics. If every possible outcome of every possible quantum event exists, then the anthropomorphic fallacy is potentially valid. For instance, there is a universe in which Stephen Colbert is funny, but the only reason Neill de Grasses Tyson observes there could be a universe in which Colbert is funny is because we are all together in this universe in which Colbert is not funny. IOW, the universe is how we observe it because we wouldn’t observe it this way if it weren’t this way.
It’s atheists’ little slide of hand to avoid admitting that the number of coincidences necessary for our universe to support life is so incredibly vast as to require there to have been an intelligent designer (God).
“It’s atheists’ little slide of hand to avoid admitting that the number of coincidences necessary for our universe to support life is so incredibly vast as to require there to have been an intelligent designer (God).”
That is what is called a binary form of argument—”Either Alternative A or Alternative B must be true”.
There are always other alternatives. The fact that we do not know of them, in fact can’t even imagine them, is our shortcoming, not a shortcoming of nature.