Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Wuli

“Not stable. not created in nature, and no implications beyond research. The universe does not look different because of this laboratory creation.”

Respected scientists in the 1600’s and 1700’s often said the same thing of electricity.


13 posted on 07/21/2022 10:11:48 AM PDT by MercyFlush (☭☭☭ Soviet Russia must be destroyed. ☭☭☭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: MercyFlush

“Respected scientists in the 1600’s and 1700’s often said the same thing of electricity.”

You left of the term “some” as fact is some scientits were exploring electricty in the 1600s, and some aspects of electricity were understood as far back as 600 B.C.

It took people a long time from understanding electricity to understanding how to conveneniently generate it “in bulk”.

Had Ben Franklin had enough time his experiments with lightening may have produced productive results before the age of Edison et al.

But life as we know it is not lived at the Quantum level, regardless of how that level is many layers below physical existence.

For nature to produce what the scientists produced in the laboratory, nature would have to somehow execute the similar means the humans did in the lab. There is no observations we know of that nature does that.


16 posted on 07/21/2022 4:13:50 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson