I can’t help but think that there was an agenda at work. The one person who was nominally in charge held back over 300 other law enforcement officers but for what reason? Maybe it’s one of those omelet situations where some eggs are going to be broken but the ends will justify the means and the larger issue of guns in the hands of ordinary citizens might be highlighted by a larger number of casualties. Progressives don’t value life for its intrinsic value only for its usefulness. If a few more children die maybe their sacrifice could have greater significance as sacrifice to the agenda. They might prove to be more useful as a mass casualty event to the progressives. It s just a cynical view but these days things are proven regularly that previously seem preposterous.
Wonder if the chief quietly retires to a Swiss lakefront villa at some point.