I don’t need Carlson to tell me what I already know.
I don’t need him to validate what I think.
What I need him to do is use his talent, his resources to obtain factual information that I can’t.
And since he refuses to do that, I no longer watch him.
Or FNC.
And since I even begrudge FNC the carriage fees, I cut the cord.
Your personal choice and one I don’t begrudge you.
But for me, I appreciate it when someone gathers the information in one spot and makes a clear and concise argument on a forum I don’t have access to. Could I make that argument myself? Yes. Do I have that soapbox? No, but Tucker does and he uses it effectively. The price he pays is whackos showing up at his house.
As for someone telling me something I don’t know, I think Tucker’s work on the January 6th fiasco has been pretty good. It so angered Wallace that he left the network.
“I don’t need Carlson to tell me what I already know.”
Since most of us are not quite the rare specimen you are, he does. Could you, for example, alert the nation with a hour long broadcast of the real goings on during Jan. 6?
“I don’t need him to validate what I think.”
Most of us, I assume, don’t watch Carlson to validate what we think. I have noticed, however, that he thinks a lot like I do.
“What I need him to do is use his talent, his resources to obtain factual information that I can’t.”
Since he has an extensive network of sources, he obtains factual information I can’t.
And since he refuses to do that, I no longer watch him.
Have you written him and brought up your concerns, and asked why he appears to avoid particular topics?