[DoodleDawg]

It is virtually impossible for people from other states to legally bear arms in California, New York, New Jersey, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Maryland.

State matter, not a federal one.

[marktwain]

It is a basic Constitutional rights matter.

Just as in Bruen, it involves a fundamental right enumerated in the Constitution and applied to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Federal government does not have to do anything in this matter, except keep the states from violating the Constitution.

[MCF]

“States matter, not a federal one”.
Not true. All rights that are presented in the Constitution are incumbent on the States.

[Lurker]

“State matter, not a federal one.”

Incorrect.

L

[MercyFlush]

“State matter, not a federal one.”

Nope. Interstate commerce is regulated by the Feds and not the states.

So a vehicle that is legally licensed to drive on the public roads in Utah (such as a Polaris) is legal to drive in all fifty states. Meaning that while someone living in California cannot license a Polaris a Polaris with a Utah license plate cannot be barred from driving in California.

Therefore a gun law applicable to California residents cannot be applied to someone temporarily visiting from a state in which that gun law does not apply.

The USSC has yet to rule on this but sooner or later they will because that’s where they’re heading.