Posted on 07/08/2022 3:08:06 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
“And they’re only going to change the pace”
“Of killing everyone in the human race”
—Sting
—Invisible Sun
“I was astounded that he didn’t have the slightest intellectual/scientific curiosity about what I had done to achieve those results.”
Conventional MDs are like that. Uninterested in anything outside of the Standard of Care aka their prescription pad.
“It is not Covid vaccination. It is that doctors and hospitals have become hostile to patients.”
Yes!
“That’s because they didn’t have vaccines to prevent the “other things”.”
No, it was not. CHD (RFK’s group) commissioned an analysis of the data and childhood vaccines account for less than 3% of the reduction in death from “vx-preventable” diseases. Public sanitation and nutrition accounted for about 97%. I bet we could get close to 100% with actual nutrition now. Obesity and crappy diet are the reasons why ppl have so many issues today. And modern medicine has failed spectacularly on both accounts. Healthy ppl don’t sell Pharma.
Not really.
Years ago the average age of death was much younger. That was because many babies and young people died of other things like dysentery and pneumonia. Go to an old cemetery. You'll see dozens of baby tombstones. You'll also see dozens of 80 year old folks. Mostly men. The women died in childbirth.
No, he didn’t advocate for inhaling Peroxide. He advocated using peroxide at a certain percentage in a humidifier to cleanse the air and of course go into the body in tiny harmless amounts.
You can drink it, but it may cause uncomfortable problems, wash your teeth with it, and I use it to rinse vegetables in to get rid of e-coli.
https://qualityhomeaircare.com/can-you-put-hydrogen-peroxide-in-a-humidifier/
https://bulkperoxide.com/cleaning-fruits-and-vegetables-using-hydrogen-peroxide/
1 out of 3 get cancer now, that is 33%.
For those who think the life expectancy went from 50 to 78, study harder.
If you correct for babies who never made it to 16 years of age, those who lived to 17 lived well into their late 60’s 70’s and 80’s. My grandma and her mom both lived late into their 90’s. The one born when the Civil War was going on, the other in 1893. My grandmother lived with her sister, and aunt and they were all destined to live to 90+.
It is a hobby of mine to cruise cemeteries. Some women had up to 8 children die before age 12. That’ll skew numbers.
1 in frickin 3 will get Cancer. 1 in 2 males, 1 in 4 females.
Better stock up on Dr. Joseph Mercola’s supplements.
So lazy they can’t write up their findings and submit them for peer review.
But do have time to hawk their products and wares.
LOL
Well said.
DD is misrepresenting what Mercola advocates.
As usual.
If it doesn’t fit the big pharma paradigm, he disses it.
Peer review?
Like the Lying Lancet??????
Sure, we should trust that, right?
And some hate modern medicine enough they will indeed listen to nonsense
The Lancet is ONE journal.
So ALL peer review cannot be trusted? At all?
Come on.
While I agree with Owen that the increase in cancer rates is not a particularly relevant, I disagree with him that it disqualifies the rest of the doctor’s remarks. If there is an increase in cancer rates after vaccination, that is a serious concern.
Any thoughts on the surging cancer rates?
Tymesup wrote: “Any thoughts on the surging cancer rates?”
An aging population means an increase in cancers.
Mercola and Cole are not credible. You do know that Mercola makes millions from selling his snake oil cures. This is the man who insisted inhaling hydrogen peroxide cures covid.
The Lancet was supposed to be one of the best.
If they lied, what makes you think others didn’t or don’t?
It’s pretty well known that only PC approved “research” is “ peer reviewed”, which is basically the good old boys club rubber stamping each other’s research they already decided supports their agenda.
It’s meaningless.
Will disagree, 100%.
And well known by who? FReepers?
There are several meteorological journals that have quality research. I know several of the researchers that submit research to a couple of journals. Neither does normative science and they are hard workers. The journals are very good.
Oh No.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.