The Lancet was supposed to be one of the best.
If they lied, what makes you think others didn’t or don’t?
It’s pretty well known that only PC approved “research” is “ peer reviewed”, which is basically the good old boys club rubber stamping each other’s research they already decided supports their agenda.
It’s meaningless.
Will disagree, 100%.
And well known by who? FReepers?
There are several meteorological journals that have quality research. I know several of the researchers that submit research to a couple of journals. Neither does normative science and they are hard workers. The journals are very good.