Voting machines are much more secure.
/\
What a crock.
Paxton was asked to certify smartmatic/ dominion for the state of Texas when he was AG.
He made a 3 hour vid, complete with domoniin manual flow charts and diagrams.
It was infinitely hackable at numerous points. Texas didn’t use them for that election for cause.
You are flat out wrong.
.Plus no matter what the name printed on them , they are all manufactored in Communist China.
I worked the recount in my county for the 2010 congressional election. The Republican challenger had a 799 vote lead when counting ended on election night. The 14 term DemocRAT incumbent ask for a recount. Guess what!? He only wanted to recount DemocRAT stronghold precincts where there had been a "power outage" and emergency paper ballots had to be used. Well the county said, "No way Jose!" Under Texas law, you have to recount the whole county. That cost his campaign over $30K.
We recounted all the electronic votes loading each precinct in numerical order. Every precinct had identical results precinct by precinct. Then the next morning, we sorted all the absentee ballots by precinct. After all the ballots were sorted by precinct, we started counting the ballots with one precinct per table. When a precinct was finished, a new precinct's ballots would be taken to the counting table under armed escort by a county constable to a the table. We counted all the absentee ballots for the congressional race, then all the emergency ballots for the "Democrat strongholds" with "power outages." The results were IDENTICAL precinct by precinct for the whole county including the emergency ballots. In the southern counties of the congressional district where only paper ballots were used, several hundred votes "switched" to the DemocRAT candidate. Fortunately not enough votes "switched" to affect the outcome on election night. I have very little confidence in the integrity of elections that use paper ballots.