Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Boogieman wrote: “It was certainly done in a lot more than one case, as has already been admitted by multiple health authorities.”

You’ve provided one case.
You only need another 999,999.


17 posted on 07/05/2022 3:16:35 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
So you don't believe they padded the numbers to perpetuate the scamdemic?   Bless your little heart, Hammer.
21 posted on 07/05/2022 3:25:37 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke

As I said, health authorities have already admitted this was a standard practice, so no I don’t need to provide 1 million cases. Once fraud has been admitted, and admitted to be a standard practice, then the onus is on those who want to claim the numbers are legitimate to prove that they are, not the other way around.


33 posted on 07/06/2022 7:30:41 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson