Oh my. He turned off black conservatives who are likely 3% of the 5% of AZ population in AZ that are black. In reality, a black conservative knows the truth and acknowledges that 13% of the US population commits 50% of murders.
Posted on 07/05/2022 7:15:09 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
The real question: Would the state political party have 'selected' Masters under the old rules prior to the 16th(?) amendment allowing the voters direct involvement? Rinos start out slow and 'evolve' over their 6(12) years in the senate. I don't think these 2 guys could hit the ground running as back-stabbers. Arizona voters have 4 weeks to figure this out.
1st off it’s dis-proportionally Blacks doing the murders across the country. What? To state that fact is racist?
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich is terrible on election fraud, I know that.
Same as they bought the Republican candidate in Ohio. Senate seats no longer have anything to do with the states they supposedly represent.
Both Masters and Vance are Peter Thiel-backed. Thiel is much more pro-MAGA than Rove & Co.
The Kennedys took care of that. They saw a State they wanted to be a Senator of rented a hotel room and established residence, Then used their money to buy the election.
The time may be right for ‘refreshing’, outsider types. Trump got it started. Clarence Thomas got the year of the woman primed for Senators Boxer and Fienstein. It has to do with finger on the pulse of the voters and both Masters and Vance just may be tapping into it. Too bad McCarthy wasn’t facing a token primary opponent.
Town hall writer forgets to normalize the data. Blacks represent 13% of the population compared to whites who are roughly 70%.
Just remember it was Mittens who was into Capital funds, just like Masters and Vance. Vance appears more solid of the 2. Retaining Ohio may have something to do with it whereas Az. is a tougher hill to climb. We’re gonna have to go for broke on these 2 my friends. McSally was a known quantity and she got 2 chances meaning we have a hard time learning.
So, blacks, who are 13.4% of the population, committed 49.5% of the murders, while whites, who are 61.6% of the population, committed 45.3% of the murders.
How interesting.
Single offender / single victim only.
Kennedys, Clintons, Romneys, and on, and on.
Pretty obvious the Brnovich is in the McCan’t party. No way in hell.
“3,218 people were killed by black offenders while 2,948 were killed by white offenders and 874 were killed by Hispanic or Latino offenders.”
Blacks are the smallest percentage of the population of those 3 groups, yet committed the most murders. This statistic is supposed to convince me that they AREN’T the problem?
Oh my. He turned off black conservatives who are likely 3% of the 5% of AZ population in AZ that are black. In reality, a black conservative knows the truth and acknowledges that 13% of the US population commits 50% of murders.
If she worked for Brnovich that reduces her Objective Credibility to about .01 on the Smollett Scale.
Smells like Globalist/Establishment FEAR!
“it’s black people, frankly” who are responsible for shootings. In reality, expanded homicide statistics from the FBI for single victim/single offender cases show that of around 6,500 murders in 2019, 3,218 people were killed by black offenders while 2,948 were killed by white offenders and 874 were killed by Hispanic or Latino offenders.”
Black=~13% of the US population. They are WAY over represented in this statistic. I don’t care how you spin it.
1) out of state billionaires fund political campaigns? Shocker! Who knew? Clearly this has never happened before right? (looks at Mark Kelly's funding). Oh. Oh its quite the norm now. I see.
2)Brnovich was in fact very soft on election integrity issues. If that were not the case he would have prosecuted a LOT of people considering the rampant election fraud that took place in Arizona. The state was clearly stolen and he didn't lift a finger to do a damn thing about it.
3) reason #2 above is why Trump endorsed Masters.
4) Masters will be disbarred for calling Biden a criminal? Get effing real. That's a) not criminal, b) not unethical, c) not something you can be disbarred over - I've said it many times and have never been disbarred and d) true.
5)He angered Black conservatives by pointing out the truth that murders among Blacks are massively higher than their share of the population? If a Black conservative is going to be pissed off at hearing the obvious truth, then I submit he's no conservative at all. Those who need safe spaces and who get their precious widdle feewings hurt by reality are Leftists, not Conservatives.
6) Physical altercation...this is your next lie I see. First of all this guy showed up to cause trouble and then he struck a woman first. She hit back. Masters separated them as was entirely reasonable. But why am I not surprised that you would lie and take the side of a Democrat trouble maker who came there to cause trouble and who struck a woman first?
7) your next lie is to try to equate his antiwar stance as being somehow Nazi like....yeah, because the Nazis were clearly against war. "Herman Goerring quote". Give me a break. You are utterly laughable when you claim obvious BS like this....or that saying the wars the US has gotten involved in were unjustified is somehow some kind of insult to the servicemen who fought in them. Plenty of them said the same things themselves.
8) You then claim the Democrats will destroy Masters. I'll take that bet. Gun Grabbing China Sellout Mark Kelly is none too popular. He's been nothing but a rubber stamp for Chuck Schumer. He represents the out of state billionaires who funded his campaign - not Zonies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.