Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: aimhigh

Excellent dissent from Thomas.


3 posted on 06/27/2022 10:43:10 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fido969

The “actual malice” standard from the 1964 Times v. Sullivan case does need to be re-examined, but apparently the other originalists didn’t think this was the right case to do so.

Start down that road and lose and the horrible standards will only be strengthened.


18 posted on 06/27/2022 10:54:53 AM PDT by bigbob (z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson