So, what does this actually mean?
What does what I posted mean?
It means that SPLC sends out a bunch of fundraising propaganda in the mail, and by other means. Much of that propaganda consists of hysterical fearmongering about “neo-nazis” (whatever those are). The propaganda is targeted at elderly Jewish people, particularly women, intending to secure donations from them to the SPLC. SPLC are scumbags.
Did I really have to spell it out for you?
IANAL but I think that Thomas will eventually get 3 other justices to agree to revisit Sullivan v NYT. He has convinced the court to go back to the history of the BOR’s and the 14th to determine what the founders believed at the time of the constitution writing/passing on other cases.The decision in Bruen, (NY gun case), made it clear that if the laws and traditional understanding/use at the time of the constitution/14th did not require or allow for there to be one set of rules for the average citizen for a constitutional right to exist vs a separate set of rules for other citizens that is more restrictive than the separate rules are unconstitutional. At the time of the founding no one was exempt from slander/libel/defamation suits because of the profession they were involved in, nor was anyone libeled/slandered/defamed required to prove anything other than a slander/libel/defamation had occurred, the slander/libel/defamation was false and they suffered “damages” because of it. Newspapers were frequently sued by average citizens, politicians and the famous of the time for slander/libel/defamation and some were held accountable.