Still protecting the leaker, is Roberts.
A rather simplistic and overly racialist view of the Taney decision ( which went 7-2) but interesting.
Robert’s has a lot of skeletons in his chamber er I mean closet.
First, there is no evidence whatsoever that Roberts “sought to alter” the draft report.
If you read the draft, and the final, the only thing that happened was that a) Alito directly responded to the dissents in detail, and b) Roberts’s concurrence, which I examine at length in Today’s News at www.uncoverdc.com, was extensive. These both take an exceptional amount of time to write. Alito had to look at every case the dissenters cited, and then find his own case law.
So I think Roberts was far too busy on his concurrence to bother trying to change minds, which he knew wasn’t going to happen anyway. If ACB and Kavanaugh, who HAD THEIR LIVES THREATENED and had stalkers outside their homes, weren’t moved by that, they sure weren’t gonna be moved by little Johnny’s petitions.
Everyone knew Roberts was a fake conservative and everyone knows this decision hurt the power of the national media to control minds with one message. Whenever the decisions are moved from national to local, it’s bad for Dems/media.
“Dobbs Decision Leaves Roberts and the Media as Biggest Losers”
A ridiculous headline. Neither Roberts nor Media are in the contest. The contest is between citizen voters.
Furthermore, the media is making lots of money as the pubic is gobbling up the reporting on this controversial subject.
Roberts was a LOSER a LONG TIME before this.
I wonder, sometimes, why it is so difficult for these justices to determine whether something is constitutional or not. The question before SCOTUS was whether abortion was enumerated as a right in the Constitution.
Take fifteen minutes, maybe half an hour to actually read the Constitution - then they’ll have their easy answer . . .