[Morgana]

Sorry you all these stories just keep coming in and I can't help myself.

WHY does a Prime Minister from Down Under care what a Supreme Court in the USA does?

It's not your business Sir. Run your own freaking country. Shut up Sir.

[Secret Agent Man]

Its only a “setback” if you are unhappy women can no longer legally murder an unborn baby.

Or another way to look at it, it’s a restoration of human rights to unborn children.

[Secret Agent Man]

New World Order weighing in. Thats why.

Soros and Gates spewed some crap today too.

[MercyFlush]

Yup. Not really caring what British countries tell us to do. Bite me.

[BenLurkin]

Global evil sticking together. Same places that used the shamdemic to crush the rights of their citizens.

[sockmonkey]

I wish he’d work on Julian Assange’s plight, an Australian citizeñ looking at 175 years in a US super max prison. Oh, he as all on about it during his campaign though.

[Aussiebabe]

Because he a dope and further left than Biden. He doesn’t understand the USA abortion laws and he doesn’t even understand what the laws are in Australia.

[Right_Wing_Madman]

It's not your business Sir. Run your own freaking country.

I favor all political and judicial decisions that anger the Australian and New Zealand governments.

[FlingWingFlyer]

I’m all for the SCOTUS decision. It’s like somebody floated a turd in the left’s celebratory Gun Control punch bowl. LOL! Friggin’ clowns. Drink up! Ha!

[AnthonySoprano]

.
Crazy idiots.

Globalist fools.

[Equine1952]

I wish these a**holes would cease this constitutional right shi*t. It was bad law subverting the constitution. Find the word abortion in the constitution and post it or STFU mister PM.

[Paladin2]

Sorry, but the country of King George III needs to bugger off.

Forever....

[Paladin2]

The Stalinist Aussies can bugger off in perpetuity too.

[Gene Eric]

These jackwagons dance on the concept of what it mean to deserve life.

[ConservativeInPA]

'Well, people are entitled to their own views, but not to impose their views on women for whom this is a deeply personal decision,' Mr Albanese said.

In a way, he’s correct. It’s probably a deeply personal decision to commit premeditated murder. Anyone with a conscience or a modicum of morals has to consider the spiritual consequences of murdering a baby, even if they are not religious. Call that psychological consequences for the nonbelievers.

[JudgemAll]

The Brits want to invade America for wronging Malthus again.

[Vendome]

Naw

This is the effing problem you moron:

Liberals have no one to blame but themselves. It is 100% their fault Roe was overturned.

A lot of people could sympathize, with the scared teenager, the rape victim, the drug addict who had no business raising a child...We didn’t like it, but we could understand.

But we went from “safe, legal, and rare”, to abortion up to the moment of birth. Actually murdering a fully formed baby up to the moment of birth.

Hat tip “Mr K”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4074120/posts?page=5#5

That and the man has been removed from the decision process entirely.

Eff that...

[joshua c]

i am really getting tired of saying, “who?”

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Another MARXIST turf heard from.

[dfwgator]

Stay in your effing lane, PM.

[sauropod]

'Well, people are entitled to their own views, but not to impose their views on women for whom this is a deeply personal decision,' Mr Albanese said.

Yeah, well, who cares about the babies whose lives were snuffed out?

I mean after all, did the baby have a choice about being killed?