[DiogenesLamp]

You can't just look at the final numbers, say they show a suspicious pattern, and overturn an election on that basis. You have to be able to point to specific individuals committing specific offenses that you can trace to specific vote totals.

Why? If you find your water has been poisoned, do you have to know who did it before you refuse to drink it?

Throw it out. All you should have to prove is that it's poisoned.

Fetch another batch.

[kiryandil]

Why? If you find your water has been poisoned, do you have to know who did it before you refuse to drink it?

You have to drink the poisoned water unless the poisoner confesses to the poisoning - while reaping the rewards of NOT confessing [power over the government of the United States].

That's what I'm seeing from the FR vote fraud deniers.