You continue to use this analogy, yet we all know most umpires are not corrupt, paid off or owned like what were dealing with in the real world. Is your umpire in this case an honest umpire, or is this imaginary umpire similar to the backstabbing corrupt insider sellouts, who are trying to destroy America by any means necessary?
Or does it matter to you?
Why does it matter to you given that the umpire’s call still controls the outcome no matter what we say or how loud we say it or how many times we repeat it.
Not only doesn’t the ump care. The audience doesn’t care. They’ve left to stadium and gone home. They will not come back and ask for a do over, or fire the ump, no matter how many times you prove it was a ball that he called a strike.
We have to find a way to actually solve the problem. Otherwise we just give up and hand the game to the other side. Is that what you propose?