Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NorthMountain

He exposes that he’d prefer to “reinterpret” the 2A as he wants. Sorry, doesn’t work that way. They know they have to change the Constitution by its defined process but won’t even try, they know they’ll fail.


74 posted on 06/21/2022 11:25:38 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: fuzzylogic

Consequently, leftist resort to the courts. There, they hope to find a judge who will rule that either

1) The Constitution means something completely alien to what is actually written or

2) The Constitution means something completely opposite to what is actually written


75 posted on 06/21/2022 11:27:52 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzylogic
You know, I think that really needs to be the simple answer to any infringement of the 2nd amendment, 'If you don't like it (shall not be infringed), then suggest and update the 2nd amendment.'

At some point, the courts need to clear the deck of all infringing federal, state, and local laws, saying that if anyone wants to limit or alter the 2nd amendment (shall not be infringed), then they need to do so as provided in the constitution.

80 posted on 06/21/2022 11:44:12 AM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson