When I saw the article’s title, I thought the author was going to lay out some kind of proof. All I got was a B- opinion essay and an ad with four people in leotards turning into a tiger.
“All I got was a B- opinion essay ...”
I disagree. There were many facts cited, such as:
1. Fact: Debunked does not mean “inconvenient to leftist narrative.” Debunked indeed means thoroughly investigated and found untrue.
2. Fact: courts have not investigated or debunked election fraud claims. It is true they have used procedural and legalistic means to avoid investigating election fraud.
3. Fact: Leftist media types and DNC have done nothing similar to “2000 Mules” to make their case that there was true election integrity. They simply make baseless statements (Trump’s big lie) without providing any evidence for their position.
Yes there was opinion, but it was backed up with facts.
“All I got was a B- opinion essay ...”
I disagree. There were many facts cited, such as:
1. Fact: Debunked does not mean “inconvenient to leftist narrative.” Debunked indeed means thoroughly investigated and found untrue.
2. Fact: courts have not investigated or debunked election fraud claims. It is true they have used procedural and legalistic means to avoid investigating election fraud.
3. Fact: Leftist media types and DNC have done nothing similar to “2000 Mules” to make their case that there was true election integrity. They simply make baseless statements (Trump’s big lie) without providing any evidence for their position.
Yes there was opinion, but it was backed up with facts.