Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: billakay

Let’s consider Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin he felt that through his personal convictions he could not take orders from what he considered an unlawful president - Prez Zero. He stood his ground and suffered the consequences for it. Rightly or wrongly about his interpretation of Zero’s constitutionally he accepted the consequences.

Snowden in his opinion felt what he saw as a BAH employee was unlawful. So, his solution was to give documents to foreign powers - hostile powers. He claimed he did it as a form of protest. He then fled the country. Why didn’t he send them to the media like say NYT? Maybe even some other far left media outfit. There are plenty to choose from. They would have been happy to have them. Why didn’t he after releasing them to the media stand his ground, behave like Col. Lakin?

The answer is obvious!


92 posted on 06/18/2022 4:18:38 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Reily
Do you really think that any US media (all under the control of the intelligence services) would have published his stuff in this day and age? The Pentagon Papers were an eternity ago as far as government control of media is concerned.

My position is that if the US government is doing something wrong, as long as it comes out, it doesn't matter which power helps. Wrong is wrong. If you don't violate the Constitution and run an immoral foreign policy, you don't have to worry about Russia or China finding it out (and to be honest, I don't see Russia as a natural adversary of the USA, but China is. Russia is only in that position because the US leadership stupidly forced them into it).

108 posted on 06/21/2022 10:37:49 AM PDT by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson