Lots of broad brush statements.
Unable to find any evidence of this claim:
“ this field made more progress in 2 years than in the prior 50.”
Based on what measure?
His article sounds nice but it’s one person’s opinion without the benefit of a lot of data underpinning is claims.
The traditional methods are so corrupted that *the data* is untrustworthy and the proof is the monstrous cluster-f*<x we are living in.
We have all seen for ourselves that the *experts* are at best frauds and at worst, genocidal. Instead of the vaunted and controlled *peer review* in tightly-fenced & guarded *journals* supported by Pharma, the creative and accomplished are collaborating and all the professionals that have been lauded by toadies and followed by the lazy are rightly being ignored.
Perhaps bean counters, politicians, and those with management experience and no real world accomplishments beyond the ability to suck up to wokeness (I am being kind, here) and pocketing undisclosed royalties and a percentage of crony-mediated grants are being replaced. Teams of real clinicians, real bench scientists, real, on the ground, field scientists are exchanging information and knowledge in order to rectify the mess of errors and craft workable approaches for the future.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. We can all stay tuned. But, there are published results of the early interventions with repurposed, safe and truly effective medications. Published studies disproving the public health approaches (masks/mandates/lockdowns/distancing, extreme disinfection) abound. Data exists showing the disaster arising from hospital protocols of dangerous, poorly-trialed drugs and ventilation.
Paper after paper from across the globe documents the ghastly results of the mRNA treatments. I’m sure the data from sources derided by Pharma and authoritarian state actors led by unelected technocrats bound and determined to inflict their ideology on the entire planet will not move anyone so hidebound as to insist on continuing with failed protocols just because they are *traditional*.
Doesn’t matter. The tide has turned and alternative systems are being created and implemented. Most people took notice when Pfizer admitted to fraud, then exonerated itself because it was in league with government and so, could not have defrauded government. Both are now distrusted and reviled around the globe because they defrauded us all. Government only exists as representatives of the people, who are the only source of its legitimacy & revenue.
The best trait of humanity is adaptability. We are all adapting, improvising and overcoming. Malone (Bench scientist and management/clinical trial expert),Van Den Bossche (DVM epidemiologist, virologist, experienced public health administrator), McCollough (clinician, journal editor, highly published & cited in his field of cardiology), Yeadon (bench scientist, pharma executive, entrepreneur), Kirsch (tech entrepreneur, MIT graduate with buildings bearing his name, IT engineer) & Weinstein (evolutionary biologist, field scientist, author, teacher, iconoclast) are publishing. (There are others, all accomplished, all publishing) Look for their work. It is available without the overhearing imprimatur of the ossified technocratic self-designated *elite*.
The powers that be tried to bury these people, all accomplished in their separate fields. Instead, they came together, shared their expertise, shared protocols outside the artificial academic silos, created workable systems that are attracting clients and patrons but are not even discussed in the controlled and corrupted legacy state media and became literal seeds now sprouting.
It takes individual effort to discern the future harvest from a young, hybrid plant. It will not be available prepackaged and predigested.
We can only hope that this sorely-needed effort is not met with a totalitarian purge, but if it is killed, it will create so many martyrs that they will inspire generations of innovators.