Except that’s not how it works.
No matter.
Oh?
*Peer Review*, already exposed as cronyistic/controlled/corrupt cannot be done outside the controlled format?
Why not?
Who says?
It does appear to matter, since you harped on it, so explain to us why no peer of GVDB can simply set up a debate, write a refutation or challenge Geert?
At his level, there are not a lot of peers.
More and more questions arise when all critiques become dismissive.
It’s almost....controlled.