He’s so confident in his predictions that he won’t submit for
peer review.
It’ll be easy to test his hypothesis. We have two months!
Peer review? There isn’t time and the evidence is way too clear. The interview is a month old and what he says is evident already. Besides that, he’s confirming stuff that the mRNA guys have already said.
...Platform vaccine technologies may feature dual-use potential through informing or enabling pathogen engineering, which may raise the risk for the occurrence of deliberate, anthropogenic biological events...
Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines against SARS-Cov-2
Given the mystery pediatric hepatitis cases and now monkeypox, pay special attention to the info on adenovirus and orthopoxvirus vectoed vaccines.
You mean like the kind of peer review done by entities like The Lancet?
What a joke.Nothing but the good old boys club high fiving each other for parroting the party line.
The Lancet has done nothing but prove what a farce “peer review” really is.
...peer review...
_______
Have you researched the amount of cronyism and outright fraud being discovered and discussed concerning peer review and medical journals? It is a worthwhile investigation.