“No I don’t. I pick those because they are simple, and easy to understand, which makes it difficult for you to dismiss the point without looking like an @$$.”
I finally understand.
Slavery was legal but immoral therefore slavery should be abolished.
Your example when applied to this situation becomes:
Owning private property is legal but immoral therefore ownership of private property should be abolished.
Even though I now understand you I still don’t agree with you.
Nope. That's just you straw manning again.
My first argument is "that's not litter".
My Second Argument is "The Judge should have talked to the man and dismissed the case."
My Third Argument is "A Pastor should have turned the other cheek."
I will point out that a charge of "litter" isn't a private property argument.
I will agree that the legal system will recognize the father as the owner of the property, but the charge isn't trespassing, it's "litter", and as near as I can tell the plaintiff is the City.
The boy feels he has some right to her memory, and I cannot fault him for feeling that way. This is likely his mechanism for grieving.
Or it was. I think once he realized the father was trying to hurt him, it became a pissing contest.
He will ultimately win it you know. The father will likely die before him, and with no one to complain, he can put that stuff back on the grave again.