No you stop with your idiotic crap. You have to cherry pick two extreme examples from 60 and 200 years ago. Plus you are totally disingenuous and IGNORE, over and over again hard facts in this case that are INCONVENIENT for you and your position.
No I don't. I pick those because they are simple, and easy to understand, which makes it difficult for you to dismiss the point without looking like an @$$.
Yes, people decide whether or not to obey the law based on their own morality, not because it's "the LAW!"
Plus you are totally disingenuous and IGNORE, over and over again hard facts in this case that are INCONVENIENT for you and your position.
Do these facts address the moral issue? No? Then they are irrelevant and they should be ignored.
Get ready for the catastrophic DEF shortage.
People are discussing the hacking of this DEF system on trucks to allow them to continue operating in violation of "The LAW"!
They warn that without doing something, the nation is heading for a serious disaster.
So what do you say about breaking the law?
Are you willing to starve for the sake of "The LAW!" ?