Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator
No. It may look like litter but legally it is not.

Cause the word means whatever we want it to mean when we feel like changing it.

Besides, it is all cleaned up.

So how did that happen? And why didn't it happen in this case?

This idiot judge calling it "litter" is the same as that idiot California judge calling a bee a "fish."

It's the same legal idiocy we are seeing all over the country now.

No reasonable person would call it "litter." That is something that only a Legal @$$ would do.

302 posted on 06/13/2022 2:05:52 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Cause the word means whatever we want it to mean when we feel like changing it.

You are them! There is hard legal definition, you have read it, and yet "litter" it is whatever you decide it is. If I placed the Mona Lisa on the side of some street, it is legally defined as "litter". Does matter what you think or that it is worth a bazillion dollars. Same as if I dumped a ton of gold bars on someone' front lawn. I could get charged with littering.

309 posted on 06/13/2022 2:23:13 PM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson