No. They can’t find a man.
He’s either living the single life that he was denied in his 20’s, or he’s convinced that nobody wants him so he keeps himself absent.
That’s what the article says.
I can see this
Nah.
I could be married 30 years ago.
Many women wanted that. They were harboring anger I did not care to deal with.
Just be an owner of your life.
MGTOW
If a man isn't Alpha in his 20s, he won't be Alpha in his 30s. So he won't be living any "single life" even then.
He might have more money. So he'll be a rich Beta. But still only a Beta.
Women in their 30s will marry rich Betas, but they don't really want them. They're settling.
You’re both right.
In her 20’s, she wants a “desirable” (Alpha) man, someone who excites her. Such men are uncommon and in demand, and while he’ll happily sleep with an average woman, he has options besides getting married.
In her 30’s, she finds that she no longer attracts the kind of men she finds exciting, and decides to “settle” for a “reliable provider” (beta) man, get married, and strip him of his assets in divorce a few years later. Except that too high a percentage are uninterested in playing that game.
Or he's not interested in marrying a woman who's closer to her 100th sex partner than her first, for reasons that are obvious to anyone except feminists.
Or he doesn't want to marry under circumstances in which his wife can cheat and the divorce court will make him pay and make it difficult for him to see his children.
Isn't "hookup culture" grand? Can we finally admit that what goes on in people's bedrooms really does matter to society?