Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

G-forces mean nothing, obviously, but nice try Michio.

Transcript (auto-generated by YouTube)

0:00
the jurogan experience the
0:03
2017 new york times article uh in my
0:06
mind made
0:08
that was a big shift because when the
0:10
new york times is reporting about it and
0:12
saying that this is major news and this
0:15
is real and there’s
0:16
video evidence that they can’t ignore
0:18
when you talk to high-level people at
0:21
the government and people like commander
0:23
david fravor who had that
0:26
infamous spotting off of the coast of
0:28
san diego when you hear about people
0:30
like that that are very reputable it
0:32
starts to change the conversation in a
0:34
lot of people’s eyes right it used to be
0:37
that one person would see something in
0:38
the sky and say look martha look there’s
0:41
something up there
0:42
now things have changed now we have
0:45
multiple sightings by multiple modes
0:47
that is the gold standard the gold
0:50
standard for looking for these objects
0:52
not just one person but several people
0:55
that are reputable not just radar but
0:58
visual sighting infrared sensors
1:01
telescopic evidence now we have multiple
1:03
sightings by multiple modes and so the
1:06
burden of proof has shifted it used to
1:08
be the burden of proof was on the people
1:11
who believed in ufos they saw something
1:13
prove it
1:14
now the burden of proof has shifted to
1:17
the pentagon to the military now they
1:19
have to prove that these aren’t
1:21
extraterrestrial
1:22
and so i think there’s been a sea change
1:24
a sea change in the last uh just several
1:26
years you know 50 years ago there was a
1:29
congressional hearing
1:30
and it was coming out of project blue
1:33
book
1:34
and there was a lot of laughter and a
1:36
lot of jokes about things little green
1:38
men in outer space 50 years ago that’s
1:41
the way it was now
1:43
things have changed now people are
1:45
looking at
1:46
looking at are they a threat militarily
1:49
what kinds of sensors do we have what
1:52
kind of metrics do we have
1:54
we now have frame by frame an analysis
1:58
of these objects these objects travel
2:00
between mach 5 and mach 20 that’s 20
2:04
times the speed of sound
2:06
these objects can zigzag
2:08
and we can measure the g-force inside
2:11
the this object the g-forces are several
2:14
hundred times the force of gravity in
2:17
other words any living person’s bones
2:19
would be crushed by these objects so
2:22
they’re probably drones of some sort
2:24
these objects can drop seventy thousand
2:26
feet in a few seconds think about that
2:29
it can drop a tremendous distance in
2:31
just a few seconds and
2:34
they can go underwater
2:36
this is something that we didn’t realize
2:37
before but yes they could actually go
2:39
underwater
2:40
and they also move without creating an
2:43
exhaust or breaking the sound barrier
2:45
so these are things that we can now
2:47
document frame by frame looking at these
2:50
videotapes
2:53
so for yourself what was the shift and
2:56
how did you feel about ufos say like
2:58
10 15 years ago
3:00
well there is this giggle factor and
3:02
it’s the third rail of course of your
3:04
scientific reputation
3:06
if you believe in these things but the
3:08
evidence is accumulating over the last
3:11
several years now when i was first
3:13
approached by caroline corey the
3:15
producer of this film a tear in the sky
3:19
i was skeptical i said to myself come on
3:22
i mean five days five days you’re going
3:25
to look for flying saucers in the sky
3:28
what happens if the aliens are camera
3:30
shy and they don’t show up in five days
3:33
so i was pleasantly surprised when they
3:35
actually found something they actually
3:37
have photographic evidence of objects
3:39
that can gyrate just the way the
3:41
pentagon has said and so we now have a
3:44
sea change a center of gravity has
3:47
changed with regards to looking at these
3:49
objects we no longer simply look at one
3:52
individual seeing something in the sky
3:55
no we demand hours of videotape multiple
3:58
sightings by multiple modes that’s the
4:01
gold standard now so what do you think
4:03
is happening do you think that this is
4:06
something that maybe
4:08
another government from another country
4:10
has created that far surpasses our
4:13
abilities or do you think that this is
4:15
coming from somewhere else well the
4:17
pentagon has listed i think five
4:19
different options uh one option of
4:21
course is that they’re weather balloons
4:24
or something that’s an artifact of our
4:25
space program
4:27
maybe a piece of rocket that is is
4:30
plunging back into the earth’s
4:31
atmosphere
4:32
uh that’s one category another category
4:35
is anomalous
4:36
weather events
4:38
they happen and they have to be looked
4:40
at very carefully but the last option
4:43
the last option is other
4:46
that is not just the russians or the
4:48
chinese because these objects apparently
4:50
can generate faster than what the
4:53
chinese and the russians can muster but
4:56
it opened the door to the possibility of
4:59
other they didn’t specify what other was
5:02
but you can fill in the dots yourself
5:05
now one possibility for other is
5:07
hypersonic drones we see that in warfare
5:11
now the russians in the battle of
5:13
ukraine is actually using hypersonic
5:16
drones to hit targets inside ukraine
5:20
to be hypersonic you have to go faster
5:21
than mach 5 anything faster than five
5:24
times the speed of sound is called
5:26
hypersonic and so the russians are now
5:28
fielding hypersonic drones in warfare
5:32
but you see this is something just in
5:33
the last few months
5:35
these sightings they go back decades
5:38
into the past
5:39
with objects executing these gyrations
5:42
decades ago and that’s why you have to
5:44
take them seriously so the commander
5:47
david fravor event that we talked about
5:49
off the nimitz that was 2004.
5:52
do we have an accurate understanding
5:54
about military capability in terms of
5:57
like drones and propulsion systems from
6:01
2004 or are there things that are
6:04
classified that we are not going to have
6:06
access to like is it possible
6:09
that you know 18 years ago they had the
6:12
capability
6:13
to have a vehicle or a drone move this
6:16
way
6:17
that just that information has just not
6:19
been released
6:20
well two years ago the united states
6:22
military admitted that it stopped
6:25
working on these hypersonic drones why
6:28
they’re unstable they zigzag and that’s
6:31
why the russians have put a premium on
6:33
this technology to evade our star wars
6:35
program
6:36
the russians wanted a rocket that can
6:38
maneuver
6:40
and therefore outwit a stationary star
6:43
wars system designed to shoot down
6:45
these drones right so that’s why the
6:47
russians have put a priority on this and
6:49
they’ve now fielding in warfare we
6:51
actually see them as a military weapon
6:53
two years ago the united states military
6:56
stopped its program they’re too unstable
7:00
they they were not reliable and it was
7:03
not worth the amount of money to put
7:04
into it because the military was
7:06
invested in the star wars program not
7:08
the anti-star wars program but because
7:12
vladimir putin announced the hypersonic
7:14
drones that the united states military
7:16
said oops nope we have to get into the
7:18
game too so now the united states is
7:20
also working on hypersonic drones as
7:22
well as the chinese so the chinese the
7:25
russians and americans are all working
7:27
on these things but you can see how
7:29
primitive they are
7:30
we’re talking about objects that define
7:33
the known laws of aerodynamics with the
7:35
technology beyond what we have today
7:39
and so that’s why people are scratching
7:41
their heads
7:42
whose are these things if they’re not
7:44
the chinese the russians or the united
7:46
states
7:47
so
7:48
one of the main
7:49
points of contention is
7:51
the lack of visible propulsion method
7:55
right there’s no
7:56
it essentially there’s no heat signature
7:59
there’s nothing that we understand to be
8:01
present that normally exists when
8:04
something is going at a tremendous rate
8:05
of speed that’s right not only that
8:07
these objects create no sonic booms
8:10
when you exceed the sound barrier uh you
8:13
create a gigantic boom that is then
8:16
shatters windows and can be heard miles
8:18
around these objects can effortlessly
8:22
break the sound barrier and not create a
8:24
sonic boom and they don’t create any
8:27
exhaust
8:28
we don’t see any exhaust trail from
8:30
these objects so either they’re an
8:32
optical illusion of some sort
8:34
or they have a set of laws of physics
8:37
beyond what we what we can muster now if
8:40
they are
8:41
a optical illusion
8:44
if an object were to move in front of
8:46
your eyes traveling at a very slow
8:47
velocity
8:48
but you don’t know how far they are away
8:51
you may think that object is very far
8:53
away from you traveling at enormous
8:56
velocities
8:57
so a weather balloon drifting in front
8:59
of your eyes
9:01
can simulate an object traveling at
9:03
hypersonic velocities if you think that
9:05
weather balloon is far away from you
9:08
so how do you tell the difference well
9:10
you look at wind patterns it turns out
9:13
that many of these sightings these
9:14
objects defy the direction of the wind
9:18
if they are weather balloons that you
9:19
confuse with a flying saucer
9:22
then they would be moving with the
9:24
direction of the wind but these objects
9:27
do not do that these objects can go
9:29
against the direction of the wind not
9:31
only that but we have multiple sidings
9:34
if an object is very very far away and
9:37
if an object is close to you but you
9:39
think it’s far away then it then is
9:42
traveling at an enormous velocity while
9:44
it’s actually just drifting in front of
9:46
your eyes how do you tell the difference
9:48
by having multiple sensors
9:50
radar infrared sensors visual sighting
9:54
then you can tell how far this object is
9:56
away from you and then you can say that
9:58
no it’s an optical illusion well
10:01
we do that now we have multiple
10:03
sightings of these objects by radar we
10:06
know how the velocity the distance
10:08
each time it comes out to be real
10:11
and so that’s why we’re scratching our
10:12
heads who has this capability and the
10:16
answer is we don’t know
10:18
is there anything that’s theoretical
10:21
that you’re aware of that could be
10:23
applied like some from some other planet
10:26
or some other galaxy or whatever that
10:30
something that maybe we have theorized
10:33
that could be responsible for the way
10:34
these things are able to move
10:36
well you know when i talk to my friends
10:38
who are physicists like myself about
10:40
these things they sort of like laugh
10:42
giggle their eyes roll up to the heavens
10:45
and they say something very simple
10:48
that a rocket using conventional means
10:50
would take seventy thousand years to
10:53
reach us from the nearest star
10:56
therefore these objects cannot exist
10:58
seventy 000 years for a saturn rocket
11:01
traveling at 25 000 miles per hour to go
11:04
from a nearest star to the planet earth
11:06
that’s why most scientists disregard
11:09
these sightings because they defy the
11:12
laws of einstein but isn’t that kind of
11:14
silly isn’t that kind of like saying
11:16
like you can’t you know how long it
11:17
would take you to get a horse from los
11:19
angeles to sydney australia isn’t that
11:21
kind of like saying that exactly and
11:24
that’s why i say that that assumes that
11:26
these aliens or whatever
11:28
are maybe a hundred years more advanced
11:30
than us but open your mind to the
11:33
possibility that they are a thousand
11:35
years more advanced than us a thousand
11:38
years is nothing compared to the age of
11:40
the universe right the universe is about
11:43
13 uh
11:44
13 billion plus years old that’s how the
11:48
age of the universe and so the age of a
11:51
civilization
11:52
just a few thousand years ahead of us
11:55
that is just a blink of an eye to the
11:57
universe itself
11:59
and once you go to higher energies the
12:02
laws of physics begin to break down the
12:04
laws of einstein and the laws of the
12:06
quantum theory break down as something
12:08
called the planck energy
12:10
why is that important that’s what i do
12:12
for a living i work on something called
12:14
string theory which lives at the planck
12:17
energy the plunk energy is 10 to the 19
12:20
billion electron volts
12:22
that is a quadrillion times more
12:24
powerful than our most powerful atom
12:26
smasher outside geneva switzerland
12:29
any civilization that can harness the
12:32
planck energy would be able to become
12:35
masters of space and time
12:37
space and time as we know it become
12:39
unstable at the planck energy which is
12:42
far beyond anything that we can muster
12:44
here on the planet earth so we
12:47
physicists theorize how advanced do you
12:50
have to be to access the planck energy
12:53
well we rank them
12:54
the kardashev scale says that there
12:56
could be type 1 type 2 or type 3
13:00
civilizations
13:01
a type 1 civilization is maybe 100 years
13:04
more advanced than us to maybe a
13:05
thousand years
13:07
sort of like buck rogers or flash gordon
13:10
they control the weather
13:12
volcanoes earthquakes anything planetary
13:15
they control that’s type one
13:18
then this type 2
13:20
type 2 is stellar
13:21
they harness the power of an entire star
13:25
like star trek star trek would be a
13:28
typical type 2 civilization
13:30
where they manipulate entire stars
13:33
then there’s type three
13:36
type three is galactic they roam the
13:38
galactic space lanes they play with
13:40
black holes
13:42
like
13:42
like uh
13:44
the empire of the star wars series would
13:47
be a typical type 3 civilization
13:50
then the next question is what type do
13:52
you have to be to harness the planck
13:54
energy
13:55
the energy at which space and time
13:57
become unstable
13:59
where wormholes may develop gateways
14:02
through space and time portals through
14:06
empty space
14:07
you have to be type 2 or most likely
14:09
type 3.
14:11
then the next question is how long will
14:12
it take before you become type 3
14:15
well we are maybe a hundred years away
14:17
from being type one
14:19
we’re maybe a few thousand years from
14:20
being from type two and we’re maybe a
14:23
hundred thousand years being from being
14:27
type three
14:28
and a hundred thousand years is
14:30
nothing nothing on a galactic scale the
14:33
age of the universe is as i said over 13
14:36
billion years old
14:38
and so once a civilization reaches the
14:40
planck energy that is a type 3
14:42
civilization space and time
14:46
become your playground


40 posted on 07/19/2022 5:19:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

“G-forces”

When someone like Michio says something like he does at the beginning of a commentary then gets into and argument with himself by the end as though he is two different people then dont you have to wonder if the person doesnt know more but for one reason or another has to make certain statements?


41 posted on 07/19/2022 7:27:57 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson