[Observator]

If you are naturally suspicious (as am I) ask yourself this question.

If the premise of 2,000 Mules is that thousands of individuals illegally gathered and stuffed ballots, and were identified in their movements with geospatial data, why didn't the filmmakers ID a single one of these perps to their home address so they could be busted?

Obviously, at least 1/3 of their time would be spent at home - so finding them would be simple.

I'm not aware of a single mule that was originally ID'd by the filmmakers. I saw an article in which they claimed credit on an isolated incident of voter fraud, which was already facing indictment in 2020. So far, it's plenty o' sound and fury, but not much signifying.

Now Gateway Pundit is saying- Wait! There's more! It will be revealed soon...

Even for less suspicious types, you can see why Fox and NewsMax haven't covered it.

GP is swimming in ads and clickbait for patriots. As PT Barnum said...

[Reily]

You raise good points!
I guess the answer is we will see what unfolds if anything.

[MagnoliaB]

“If the premise of 2,000 Mules is that thousands of individuals illegally gathered and stuffed ballots,”

The premise??!! We WATCH THEM DO IT. I take it you haven’t watched 2000 Mules?

“why didn’t the filmmakers ID a single one of these perps to their home address so they could be busted?”

Those perps can be rounded up anytime. In the meantime going after the SOURCE of the illegal ballots can produce bigger and better results......................

https://foxmetronews.com/news/big-arizona-fraud-update-law-enforcement-raids-nonprofits-in-2000-mules-ballot-trafficking-investigation-like-tweety-birds-they-sang/