To: KrisKrinkle
Shall not be infringed is definitely not vague.
5 posted on
05/27/2022 5:09:44 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Lurkinanloomin
“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” is pretty straightforward too. I see no ambiguity in that at all.
6 posted on
05/27/2022 5:12:24 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(I await the return of The Great MAGA King)
To: Lurkinanloomin
“Shall not be infringed is definitely not vague.”
Would a law prohibiting a five year old from keeping and bearing a firearm and prohibiting parents from providing the firearm, absent a need for self defense, be an infringement?
9 posted on
05/27/2022 5:37:05 PM PDT by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson