The measured data doesn’t show warming and it should not be expected to unless the Sun’s output changes. Carbon dioxide is a very weak absorber of infrared radiation, only absorbing three narrow spectral lines. These three spectral lines would be absorbed by water vapor anyway so there is almost no difference in “warming” that CO2 should cause. Measured data shows this. It is only the greenie computer models that show warming.
“there is almost no difference in “warming” that CO2 should cause”
Interesting post. Seems like you know something about the subject.
The Wikipedia entry on greenhouse gases says that water vapor is the major greenhouse gas, but water vapor is not included in the charts they give ranking the various greenhouse gases. That omission is puzzling to me.
Until there is a proof of concept performed which shows positive results, a project plan to implement, a cost and ROI analysis and a risk and mitigation plan, it’s all BS.