Posted on 05/21/2022 4:50:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin
The Hubble Effect presumes that particles are flowing at a constant rate of speed, but the variations can be more easily explained by the gravitational pulls between large bodies of matter slowing the process overall. Matter that is free of surrounding fields will move at a constant, but matter trapped in a field will have its trajectory impacted.
Are these scientists presuming that unseen dark fields are impacting particle flow in otherwise unencumbered plains of space? Further, isnt the premise of Hubble’s Law subject to any speculation, since it presumes an Earth-centric observational approach?
Meaning, light travels at a constant rate of speed in a vacuum; however, we know not all space is a vacuum. Sufficient fields of matter, undetectable to the human eye, can alter our perception of that light ray. Ergo, there doesn’t have to be a dark fields, just good old regular matter, unless this is the suggestion just with a sexy name to it? Then it makes perfect sense.
Had a friend show up for a cosmetology lecture on career day in high school thinking it was cosmology. He was the only guy.
Sooooo... If this means there is a bizzaro world out there it would explain where woke cultists come from.
Clip, Annie Hall.The Universe Is Expanding | February 2, 2007 | CNoboro
This could also explain why gravity is so weak. We have an entire planet pulling us down but our hands can lift things in spite of all that.
It’s the Jackson number. 2 terms. 7th President. Elected in 1828 which you can double since he had two terms 2.718281828.
Insightful! Let me take advantage…
Some suggest identifying people’s size not by height and weight but by their surface area as measured in square feet. Others argue for volumetric measurement expressed in cubic furlongs.
What say you?
Height and weight are much easier to measure.
I see what you mean. This should be a satisfactory refinement:
Some suggest identifying people’s size not by height and weight but by their surface area as expressed in square feet. Others argue for volumetric identification expressed in cubic furlongs.
How is the argument swayed? Both for and against?
Even if that were somehow possible to stadardize , calculating a person's area is not a trival problem. It is like measuring the length of a shoreline. The finer the detail you are willing to use the longer the total shoreline becomes. It is known as the Coastline Paradox
Both non intuitive!
Remember this is not about measurement. No. Rather identification.
Good point though re skin's elasticity But that's merely an engineering problem. Spitballing it here.. Inflate subject, introduce subject into an air tight, pressure regulated room. Calculate based on the pressure differential with subject in versus subject out.
An advantage to this approach is you are using gas molecules as a measuring device.. can't get more “true” than that.
Homo Sapien’s “laws of nature” were made to be broken.
;-)
You are probably as anxious as I am to debut our findings to the world. Ghana is tossing around their usual monkey wrenches. Aaand delays.
Great find re the calculator. I hope it doesn't paint you as far as Mr. Big is concerned.
Back soon with substance and action plans. Stand ready and keep brainstorming, your aptitudes are coveted.
2.71828
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.