Posted on 05/19/2022 7:20:36 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
I happened to catch this on Lindell TV last night. Take a look at what Lindell is up to. He has loaded the entire voter registration database for Alabama (and other states) and now has the capability to sort the data in any fashion.
Why aren't the Supervisors of Elections doing the same to keep the voter rolls clean???????
The video showing the capabilities of what Lindell has done starts at about the 23 minute mark.
Lindell will be in Alabama today to file an injunction against the AL Sec of State re the corrupt voter rolls.
I never said there were 7 million "actual votes". I wrote there were 7 million voters on the voter rolls in Wisconsin.
This is important because the more ineligible voters on the voter rolls, the easier it is to commit election fraud by harvesting a number of the ineligible voter ballots which are still on the rolls.
Yeah, you just peruse their limited posting history and it becomes clear what the intent of their presence here is.
Things must be slow at DU or thefagblow....
kiryandil wrote:
Sucks to be thefagblow
Yeah, it was started by that worthless, mentally ill communist who went by an online moniker of “Foggy”.
He ended up getting his. 😉
Im not sure what that video he played was supposed to show.. Yes, if you photocopy a ballot it will count it... the scanner does not do anything to “check” the ballot is on official paper or something like that, it’s just a scanner/counter.
No one, as far as I know, has ever claimed the DS200 ensures the ballot is an official ballot.
If someone were to walk in and say, vote themselves and then try to stuff more ballots in the scanner with their own, this will show up at the end of the day, when the number of voters who checked and voted doesn’t match with the number of voters who checked in.
The ballots themselves are stored in the machine as well, so, if the numbers don’t match and you have a large number of ballots that clearly are not official ballots they will be detected.
Finally, every voter (at least in my state) has to sign the book to get their ballot...
So, again, I’m really not sure what they heck that video he showed earlier in the show was supposed to prove.. Yes it proves you can feed a non official photocopied ballot into the scanner and it will accept it, but it doesn’t prove anyone can just stuff ballots in the machine and get away with it.
The total number of ballots is also counted by the poll workers and other at the beginning and end of the election, to ensure no ballots have “disappeared”... if the total number of cast ballots, plus the number of spoiled ballots, plus the number of unused ballots doesn’t add up to the number of ballots given to the polling place at the start of the day, thats another red flag.
The only way you could put extra ballots in the box where people aren’t voting would have to involve a conspiracy among the poll workers, who could go through the book, find people who did not vote, forge their signatures in the book and then feed ballots into the machine for them, and even if they were to do that they would use official ballots no need to photocopy them. And you’d have to do all this either during the polls being open... You could possibly pull it off for a little while after you close the polls if everyone working that poll location were in cahoots...and you didn’t have any poll watchers from either party sitting around waiting for the final results to report back to their campaigns.
However, I don’t honestly see any scenario where if you pump extra ballots in the box that you photocopied its not going to get caught.
So, while the DS200 will scan a photocopy, stuffing the ballot box like this and it not being discovered would be impossible, unless the entirety of the poll workers were in on it... I suppose a rogue worker might be able to sneak in a few throughout the day if they were really really sneaky, take a few official ballots and fill them out, then if they were working the sign in table sign in for people so it looks like they showed up and then slide the ballot into the DS200... but even a determined individual couldn’t manage many throughout the day.. and if he signed in for someone, and then that person shows up... boom instant problem.
The current paper system is far more secure than the old touch screen only system.. only check you had with that is that the total number of voters matched.. the machines could have tallied the votes any way some bad actor wanted if they got into them.. there was absolutely no paper trail to check the computer count against, whatever it said, was gospel.
New system actually keeps the paper votes, so you can check not only the number of votes cast.. but can hand check the results if there is any reason to suspect the electronic results were tampered with.
Alabama may be different, but honestly that video showing them feeding photocopies into a DS200 scanner, pretty much proves nothing... no one has ever claimed the DS200 VERIFIES ONLY officially printed ballots can be scanned.
I’d love a copy of that database.
He has got to have a publicist also if you can find any court cases involving him, you can contact his attorney.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.