Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

MtnClimber wrote: “As I understand it, this would be a modification to an existing treaty, so it only needs a Senate majority vote.”

Well, under US Constitution that would be true but WHO is claiming that unless, within a certain time frame, a country objects, then WHO deems that country to have accepted. IOW, according to WHO, the US Constitution doesn’t apply.


5 posted on 05/15/2022 5:07:38 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

WHO don’t need no stinking Constitution.


6 posted on 05/15/2022 5:11:19 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke

the deadline to object was Friday
WHO votes next week

Biden just surrendered our sovereignty to the U.N.
and not a peep out of our “representatives”

consider the local tyranny/mandates over covid 2020
the UN will not be more gentle


10 posted on 05/15/2022 6:08:08 AM PDT by SisterK (recognize and resist tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson