Good luck finding an attorney that is not an indoctrinated marxist. The control of the means of production is at the top of the marxist wish list.
Perhaps the easiest way to defeat these agendas is to go after the clauses, which I believe exist in statute, that they must take economic impact into account.
All you’d have to show is that both the cost of implementing a regulation directly as well as the cost of the side effects are sorely underestimated.
E.g. A state implements an HOV program predicated on a nunber of drivers using it, even though some would be stuck in slower traffic. Changes in fuel purchases (detected through gas tax) in the locality, would show an increase, not a decrease in fuel taxes.
For emissions type regulations, it should also be easy to show how they have impacted the cost of vehicles in reality compared to original estimates.
There is no such a thing as a fossil fuel
I just watched the old movie VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA in which the Van Allen Radiation Belt catches fire and earth temps rise dramatically.
I wonder, since the promised COMING ICE AGE never appeared in the 1970s, if the psudo-scientists did not fall back on this movie and declare Global Warming the new threat.