For the love of God, THANK YOU!
This is NOT a small detail. It's becoming a pattern and certain people want to obscure that and ask others to overlook it.
If there's one that backs up the claims made, then please send it over and I'll tweet it and help put it to bed. https://t.co/UwiihSbfct— Rich Baris "The People's Pundit" (@Peoples_Pundit) May 14, 2022
She previously released a NG22E showing 7 years but her bio claims 10 yrs of service. Thursday she said she has a DD214 for the remaining 3 years. She just released a DD214, it accounts for only 3 months of previous service, not 3 years. https://t.co/xpeMrQ6iir— NoOne (@nooneishere51) May 14, 2022
She is a political candidate who is running on her bio.
Her DD214 didn’t say what she said.
3 days ago we were told there was no DD214
2 days ago Kathy said she had one for 3 years. Honorable discharge.
Today we find out it doesn’t reflect what she said.
But you’re mad at me? https://t.co/6t5XOGihy3— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
I have to correct my earlier statement,that she may have washed out of initial entry training.
That would be governed by Chapter 11 of AR 635-200, but the DD214 cites Chapter 4 (Discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other periods of active duty or active duty for training).
The reenlistment code is NA, meaning that she was not separated, just released from Active Duty, as Reservists and National Guardsmen are routinely at the conclusion of training.
So bottom line, we would need to see her final DD214 to know what the real story is.