>I’m just saying that it creates a small economic benefit to keep it on permanent loan to the British museums.
I agree though might be possible that the British Museum already has a sufficient amount of Nepal art examples that both sides see no benefit in the statue not going back to Nepal
I’ve got divided feelings about this in the range between “I Dont Give a F**k? The marxists are overrunning the American Landscape!” and “It’s probably better to play nice with Nepalese for Karma sake.” I’d likely prefer that the antiquities be displayed for the public collaboratively as a road show so that the context can be respected.
Isn’t this one from Yale?