A bit hyperbolic maybe?
the baby killers are welcome to try to pass a constitutional amendment to enshrine their bloodlust. But I don’t think they will have much luck.
70 million, some of which could have been grandparents by now ... “conquered” ... yeah, sure.
A Tabernacle was stolen in Katy, TX.
Pray for its safe return and the preservation of all the Host.
Catholic here. Pro-life.
Youngins at work were talking about how horrible this possible the S.C. decision is.
I told them that Saddam Hussein threw people he didn’t want into shredders.
When baby can feel pain is unknown. It’s estimated anywhere between 16 weeks to 23 weeks. Explain to me how late term abortions is any different from Hussien did?
The look on their faces was priceless.
I wonder if Jennifer is trans?
In any case, for a historian, she left out a lot of info. No mention of Susan B. Anthony, or the nemesis, Margaret Sanger, or Eugenics.
But, she makes a point of claiming the pro-life movement is “all white.”
After her earlier b’s about it being almost all Catholic.
And implying that “everyone” agreed on “the quickening” being the ultimate determining factor of whether a fetus was human or not. Pretty sure no one back then assumed the fetus wasn’t human. That it could easily be a duck.
Then she falsely smears prolifers as antisegregationists. This is an outright lie. As is her dismissal that it is a “white movement,” and her followup racist reasoning that it is white because prolife blacks and Latinos don’t bother to vote.
...”After 1980, evangelicals — a quarter of Americans — would be some of the most fervent disciples. Not all evangelicals or Catholics joined the new crusade. This was and remains a white movement. Many black evangelicals and Latino Catholics opposed legal abortion, but few voted on the issue and even fewer joined as activists. White social conservatives, some of whom had opposed racial integration in schools, borrowed the new social currency of civil rights and represented themselves as abolitionists, not segregationists.”