Skip to comments.Zullo Addresses Recent Reassertions on Obama Birth-Certificate Investigation "DECEIVE, CONFLATE AND CONFUSE"
Posted on 05/07/2022 12:45:31 PM PDT by bitt
On Wednesday, which marked the 11th anniversary of the release of an image by the White House said to represent the original birth certificate of the then-sitting president, Barack Hussein Obama II, The Post & Email sought out the investigator who conducted a 5+-year investigation into its authenticity.
Since the publication of an editorial Monday by Tom Arnold responding to an April 22 article in The Washington Examiner surrounding what came to be known colloquially as “birther” claims and the Obama regime’s response to them, a flurry of comments has been seen, on the one hand asserting the image is a forgery, and on the other, reiterating statements made by Hawaii officials during the height of the birth-certificate controversy vouching for Obama’s purported birth there on August 4, 1961.
Similar comments were submitted in response to The Post & Email’s April 20 article titled, “When Did ‘the Iron Curtain of Censorship’ Begin?” which recounted the media’s recoiling from Zullo’s revelation that the “long-form” birth certificate PDF image was found to be fraudulent beyond the standard of probable cause as well as subsequent discoveries about how it was likely created.
Some of the comments reiterated the claim that a Xerox 7655 WorkCentre copier is capable of reproducing the anomalies in the image identified by Zullo, a claim he has roundly refuted.
The probe was conducted under the authority of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, then led by Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, with Zullo and Arpaio holding three formal press conferences to report the progress and findings of the investigation at various stage
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
“As for comments critical of his decision to withhold release of the forensic examiners’ reports, Zullo responded, “I’ve said this over and over again. I will not publicly release that paid-for information. Those reports costs thousands and thousands of dollars, and they’re not out there to become public fodder. What’s not going to happen and what I will not allow to happen is the typical thing that’s been occurring since the beginning of the whole birth-certificate inquiry: that blatant lies get posted which are designed to deceive, conflate and confuse. I absolutely refuse to put forth those documents to have them bandied about in the court of public opinion, where, quite frankly, they do not matter. Those documents are reserved for the day, which I’m sure will come, when this whole incident gets examined through the proper legal channels. So they can stop asking; watch the video, and that’s all you need to know.”
Why does Obama call himself Barack Hussein Obama II? If, in fact, Obama senior was his father than Barack is a junior - not II. The II designation is for someone related with the same name but not a son. Doesn’t anybody in the White House have an etiquette book?
What a damn joke! It’s been so long since Obama ruined America and started the racial division we now live with. It might have mattered once but now it’s a moot point and it’s meant to give conspiratorial minds something to ponder.
I still don’t believe that the birth certificate is real and unfortunately nobody has ever been serious about finding or exposing the truth, including the main subject of this article.
ITS ALREADY PROVEN TO BE A FORGERY
THEY EVEN FOUND THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS
YOU DIDN’T HEAR THAT ON THE NEWS?
(rhetorical,... of course not)
Everything you’ve seen or heard about font sizes, grey-scale, centering, layering, etc (there are many videos on youtube) ARE ALL TRUE
The one about all that being the result of OCR was an absolute lie.
I did imaging software FOR A LIVING. I could be called as an expert witness in court. I knew within 5 minutes of it being released that it was a fake.
I downloaded Ovomit’s “birth certificate” right from the White House we site and the forgery was obvious. There were so many artifacts from the editing to build it from the original that it was fake to the point of being ridiculous.
Justice is never a ‘moot point’, and the people in this video have proven it is fake.
And they have release everything needed to demonstrate.
They are only holding back specifics about legal material.
I also have many years of experience in EDMS and could testify the same. I still have the abomination of a document on a computer here somewhere.
This may further tweak some sensibilities but I have no legal middle name, only an initial. Hoot L. Owl II. Lol… Blame the parents.. The kid gets no say in the matter.
Love it !!!
To date, Barry hasn’t presented enough to satisfy a liquor store clerk.
His provenance remains a mystery, even despite Trump being President.
remember how much effort DJT put into the BC before he threw his hat in the ring for pres? I was grateful that he brought a ton of attention to it and was disappointed when he abandoned it. I understand it I guess but was really hoping this could have been exposed and justice brought.
The damage was done to our constitution when the usurper was sworn in as prez on Jan 20 2009, which is when I posted the Certifigate Postmortem
That was long before the 2nd round high-priced longform forgery was produced.
Those documents are reserved for the day, which I’m sure will come, when this whole incident gets examined through the proper legal channels.
***That ship sailed on Jan 20, 2009.
I noticed it first because of the ‘layers’
I was doing imaging software at the time so when I opened an image file my default program was Photoshop. (not just the ‘viewer’- the actual image editing software)
I immediately saw layers, which seemed odd. And I could see that the layers turned on/off different sections of the text, and UNDERNEATH you could see the security paper. Not possible if the document is scanned, only possible if the security papers is scanned first, then the text added later.
If they had ‘compressed’ the final product into one layer then a lot of this could be argued about. It would still be obvious to someone who worked with images, but harder to explain to the general public.
And the next day a dumb guy lied that it was ‘OCR’ and the media and everyone glommed onto that as an excuse for the layers.
Later, Zullo’s ‘posse’ (yes, an actual legal entity in AZ) found the source documents (the documents they copied FROM), from a document 3 days different from this forgery.
A statistical impossibility for it not to be a forgery at that point. It’s almost like finding a set of fingerprints that match yours, from someone living 3 houses down.
SIDE NOTE: They claim Obama could not be Malcolm X’s son because the birthdate does not match the dates within 9 months of when his mom was with Malcom X. But I don’t think we know his real birth date.
I once put together a montage of Obama and Malcolm X’s photos and asked people to pick out which ones were Obama and which were Malcolm X.
Nearly everyone claimed some of them were Obama.
The kicker- they were ALL Malcolm X.
I spent a year of my life back in 2009 running down all the false leads in that story.
I am pretty much graphically-challenged. However, I downloaded the PDF from the WH website the night it came out. The only graphics program I had was one called Inkscape, which I had never used. I opened the image and it took only a minute or so for me learn how to tear it apart. They made a rookie mistake in forgetting to collapse the layers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.