Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: meadsjn; blu
Interesting, indeed


363 posted on 05/07/2022 12:23:47 PM PDT by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: USMC79to83

https://pjmedia.com/columns/matt-margolis/2022/05/06/dont-get-cocky-we-havent-won-yet-n1595786

Don’t Get Cocky, We Haven’t Won Yet
BY MATT MARGOLIS MAY 06, 2022 3:48 PM ET


364 posted on 05/07/2022 12:32:03 PM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Zullo Addresses Recent Reassertions on Obama Birth-Certificate Investigation

https://www.thepostemail.com/2022/04/28/zullo-addresses-recent-reassertions-on-obama-birth-certificate-investigation/

(Apr. 28, 2022) — On Wednesday, which marked the 11th anniversary of the release of an image by the White House said to represent the original birth certificate of the then-sitting president, Barack Hussein Obama II, The Post & Email sought out the investigator who conducted a 5+-year investigation into its authenticity.

Since the publication of an editorial Monday by Tom Arnold responding to an April 22 article in The Washington Examiner surrounding what came to be known colloquially as “birther” claims and the Obama regime’s response to them, a flurry of comments has been seen, on the one hand asserting the image is a forgery, and on the other, reiterating statements made by Hawaii officials during the height of the birth-certificate controversy vouching for Obama’s purported birth there on August 4, 1961.

Similar comments were submitted in response to The Post & Email’s April 20 article titled, “When Did ‘the Iron Curtain of Censorship’ Begin?” which recounted the media’s recoiling from Zullo’s revelation that the “long-form” birth certificate PDF image was found to be fraudulent beyond the standard of probable cause as well as subsequent discoveries about how it was likely created.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2306351/posts?page=12630#12630
by Elderberry


365 posted on 05/07/2022 12:39:56 PM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

To: USMC79to83

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/05/what-supreme-court-leak-means-robert-spencer/

...snip

“And now Barack Obama has called for protests: “We’re asking you to join with the activists who’ve been sounding the alarm on this issue for years and act. Stand with them at a local protest. Volunteer with them on a campaign. Join with them in urging Congress to codify Roe into law.” The intimidation will begin. Chief Justice Roberts, however, insists that it won’t work: “To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way.””


367 posted on 05/07/2022 12:52:14 PM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson