To: Drago; woodpusher; Observator; Nero Germanicus
According to Femminineo, when the Hawkins family filed suit against the Jeep owner, that person immediately sued the dealership for indemnification, and won. With that victory in place, whatever results from the Hawkins family’s suit against the Jeep owner will be the legal responsibility of Rochester Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge (and their insurance company). Basically, while the owner of the Jeep is named in the suit, that person won’t face any repercussions from the trial or judgment.” And it is exactly this sort of ridiculous reasoning and "proecedure" that makes the legal system look like the work of a child.
Natural Law needs to be resurrected.
67 posted on
05/06/2022 9:18:44 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
Happy Friday! This is definitely absurd, but it’s also an outlier.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson