1 posted on
05/05/2022 3:08:26 PM PDT by
bitt
To: ShadowAce; dayglored; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...
2 posted on
05/05/2022 3:09:00 PM PDT by
bitt
( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
To: bitt
Wonder what they are not telling us?
3 posted on
05/05/2022 3:10:56 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
No such thing, but keep warning about those shadows on the wall.
4 posted on
05/05/2022 3:11:13 PM PDT by
proust
(All posts made under this handle are, for the intents and purposes of the author, considered satire.)
To: bitt
Just enter the text of your favorite novel as a password, with a few of your own words interspersed.
6 posted on
05/05/2022 3:27:14 PM PDT by
fruser1
To: bitt
Damm. Thanks for posting. Just changed my passwords from “password” to “password123”....That should slow them down.
For about a micro, micro second.
Seems like its a good time to use something like a “yubico” security key such that one needs to insert a physical USB device in order to log onto their financial site.
8 posted on
05/05/2022 3:37:24 PM PDT by
consult
To: bitt
The bad news is that quantum machines are way more error-prone than classical computers because of decoherence.
12 posted on
05/05/2022 3:55:41 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: bitt
From what I’ve seen, mostly they’ll just have to change the ciphers accepted by encrypted connections. Some of the currently used ones are theoretically vulnerable.
14 posted on
05/05/2022 5:40:25 PM PDT by
glorgau
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson