Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PGR88
No, the program was not a failure. It was a quantum leap over anything else in the sky for 20 some years.

The F-20 cost per plane radically ballooned such that it was canceled at low numbers making the unit cost even greater by reducing the number of planes to spread outrageous development and manufacturing start up costs over. The maintenance costs of both the F-20 and B-2 are both sky high to maintain their stealth characteristics.

As an aside…. In the Afghanistan War, the wings were flown off the B-1 fleet. It needs to be retired quite a bit earlier than would otherwise be required. I have read that some or all of the fleet is no longer low level, supersonic rated as designed for its role as a contested space penetration bomber.

Anyone please correct me if I’m off on any of this.

31 posted on 05/05/2022 10:21:36 AM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Hootowl99
No, the program was not a failure. It was a quantum leap over anything else in the sky for 20 some years.

It may have been a technological marvel. I certainly don't have the ability to judge that.

But a "cost per plane radically ballooned" should be a major concern - and perhaps the reason to consider it a failure.

In WWII, we had the most advanced fighter (the P51 Mustang). Something like 15,000 were produced, at a cost, if you believe government inflation statistics, at about $800K in today's dollars.

THAT is a successful program!

36 posted on 05/05/2022 10:32:10 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson